English Dutch French German Portuguese Spanish

Exclusive: Extent of stealth fracking in Gulf of Mexico revealed

In “The Disappearing Delta,” “Fault Lines” investigates the impact of the fossil fuel industry on Louisiana’s disappearing coastline — and examines a new frontier of oil exploration: fracking in the Gulf of Mexico.

While a debate rages over the use of hydraulic fracturing to exploit fossil fuel reserves inland, the practice has quietly taken hold offshore, in the Gulf of Mexico.

Documents obtained by “Fault Lines” reveal that the world’s largest oil firms are now fracking in some of the Gulf’s deepest waters — raising questions about how it is being regulated. A list of about 100 well sites (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1659715-2013-fracking-sites.html) offers one of the first snapshots of the practice, which until just a couple years ago was unknown to the public.

“There’s been a level of secrecy that’s shielded this activity from view, literally and figuratively,” said Jonathan Henderson, who works for New Orleans’ Gulf Restoration Network. “This activity is taking place offshore, and the public can’t get out here [to see it].”

The list of sites obtained by “Fault Lines” reveals that BP, ConocoPhillips, Shell and nearly two dozen other companies were approved to use offshore fracking in 2013. It also reveals that fracking has occurred in the vicinity of the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon spill. Chevron, which operates several nearshore rigs visited by a “Fault Lines” team in January, said it also uses offshore fracking “safely and efficiently” at its deepest water site.

Offshore fracking in the Gulf of Mexico

The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) released the list of offshore fracking sites to “Fault Lines,” noting that it was not exhaustive and included sites only where the most common type of offshore fracking is used. This technique, dubbed frac-packing, has been used offshore for decades and employs highly pressurized water, gravel and chemicals to clear sand from the opening of the well and facilitate the flow of fossil fuels. According to BSEE officials, this is the type of fracking that takes place the “vast majority” of the time in the Gulfand is different from the method that has stirred debate onshore.

But the officials acknowledged in a written statement that a more expansive type of fracking, “involving higher fluid volumes and extending longer distances from the wellbore has been minimally used in the Gulf of Mexico.”

An October report in Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-08-07/deep-water-fracking-next-frontier-for-offshore-drilling) describes an emerging fracking technology taking hold at deepwater sites, which can involve harder rock formations escribed by a Halliburton engineer as “the most challenging, harshest environment that we’ll be working in.”

BSEE officials say hydraulic fracturing has the potential to increase as companies explore at more extreme depths. “BSEE is vigilant in its efforts to consider all the complexities of offshore energy development and allow for the responsible development and safe operations,” the statement read.

After months of requests for more information about this type of offshore fracking, regulators refused to offer details.

In fact, in response to early inquiries, officials at BSEE referred “Fault Lines” to materials produced by the very industry they’re charged with overseeing — pointing to the websites of three oil companies and a fact sheet produced by the American Petroleum Institute (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1659716-api-offshore-hydraulicfracturing.html), the nation’s largest oil lobbying group.

Concerns from California

Scrutiny of offshore fracking is growing, especially on the heels of reports by Truthout (http://truth-out.org/news/item/17765-special-investigation-fracking-in-the-ocean-off-thecalifornia-coast) and The Associated Press (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/calif-finds-moreinstances-
offshore-fracking) in 2013, which revealed that the practice was quietly permitted at hundreds of sites off the coast of California.

In addition to the fracking methods, environmentalists want to know the types of chemicals being used. Companies are not required to disclose that information to the public, and very few have volunteered it. Environmental watchdog Jonathan Henderson accompanied Fault Lines to several offshore fracking sites in the Gulf of Mexico. Joel Van Haren for Al Jazeera America Environmental observers in California, however, obtained a list of chemicals used at 12 offshore fracking sites off its coast.

Almost all the substances can cause damage to organs in the human body, said Miyoko Sakashita, an environmental lawyer in San Francisco.
“Half of the chemicals impacted the cardiovascular or immune system, and about a third caused some sort of brain damage or nerve system damage,” she said, adding that fracking offshore can increase the risk of an oil spill as well as air and water pollution.

The agencies charged with overseeing offshore oil activity say that companies are allowed to discharge a certain amount of fracking chemicals under the terms of a general wastewater permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. Additional wastewater is often stored and treated onshore.

In late 2014, two California-based groups, the Environmental Defense Center and the Center for Biological Diversity, prepared lawsuits against federal regulators for approving permits in violation of environmental law.

“One of our key concerns is that offshore fracking has barely been regulated at all,” said Sakashita, who works for the Center for Biological Diversity. “What we’ve found was that the federal government was largely just rubber-stamping permits.”

Fast-tracked permits

The Center for Biological Diversity points to a 2012 fracking permit (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1659714-frackingcategoricalexclusion.html) filed by the oil and gas exploration company DCOR. It shows that regulators approved fracking through a fast-track process called a categorical exclusion, which exempts industry activities from a full environmental review.

‘There seems to be no slowdown in the momentum of regulators and government politicians to drill, baby, drill.’ — Mike Tidwell -environmental writer“

Companies have lobbied for this exemption, arguing that it helps cut down on paperwork that can slow operations. After the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, it was discovered that operations at the BP site were approved using a categorical exclusion
(https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1659717-cateogoricalexclusionsbpdeepwaterhorizon.html) — and that the company lobbied regulators (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1659712-bpletterrecategoricalexclusions.html) to continue using the exemptions just 11 days before the spill.

Soon after the accident, Michael Bromwich, the head of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, announced
(http://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/Categorical-Exclusions-for-Gulf-Offshore-Activityto-be-Limited-While-Interior-Reviews-NEPA-Process-and-Develops-Revised-Policy.cfm) that the agency would curb its use of the exclusions and begin a process to review how they’re dispensed.

But environmental critics say regulators have not kept promises to tighten oversight. “Almost nothing has changed,” said Mike Tidwell, who has written extensively on climate change in Louisiana. “There seems to be no slowdown in the momentum of regulators and government politicians to drill, baby, drill.”

Chevron, which obtained approval to frack at least 11 offshore sites in 2013, also lobbied federal regulators soon after the Deepwater Horizon spill to continue fast tracking permits. An oil rig operated by the oil and gas giant Chevron in the Gulf of Mexico. Joel Van Haren for Al Jazeera America When regulators opened a public review of categorical exclusions, Chevron representative J. Keith Couvillion wrote a letter (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1659713-chevronletterrecategoricalexlcusion.html) urging regulators to “avoid duplicative, wasteful and time-consuming efforts.” He argued that “the framework already in place should continue to be used.”

Regulators say their review of categorical exclusions is ongoing and that exemptions continue to be used — but only after considering extraordinary circumstances like whether the operation in question involves the use of a “new or unusual technology.” “We still don’t know the dangers involved,” said environmental watchdog Henderson. “And we in the Gulf, we have a right to know because its our home, it’s our culture, it’s our tradition. Everything is at risk.”

 Source: Original article

Download some info in the attachment section below

Download attachments:
You are here: HomeResearchReports and StudiesOffshoreExclusive: Extent of stealth fracking in Gulf of Mexico revealed
  • ASMAA - Algarve Surf and Marine Activities Association
    NIPC: 510 381 952
    Tel: 00 351 282 182 103
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Rua Dr. Alberto Iria
    Lote 12, R/C Esq
    Porto de Môs
    Lagos 8600-580
Go to top